This book didn’t seem as great the second time I read it. It’s depressing when that happens.
First, I don’t enjoy fiction that tries to teach politics and philosophy.
Second, T. H. White is very good at showing complex motivations. Arthur is no stainless monarch. Lancelot and Guenever are both heroic and annoying. And White is more generous to the medieval Church than most revisionist storytellers today would be. So why couldn’t he make Mordred a full character? I don’t understand how an author who clearly has the skills to resist this kind of thing could fail so badly in creating this character, the purely evil badguy.
Sunday, July 30, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Links
- the Evil Line
- Arts & Letters Daily
- Creole-English dictionary
- Chocolate and Zucchini
- pedestrian empowerment
- the diary of Samuel Pepys
- plant of the day
- Language Log
- wild parrots of Brooklyn
- learning to love you more
- Nabaztag
- plant image library
- geography practice
- tying shoelaces
- find a library cat near you
No comments:
Post a Comment